Showing posts with label consumer research. Show all posts
Showing posts with label consumer research. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 20, 2022

Why Should Marketers Care About Leo's Girlfriends?

 

In the past week we’ve all seen it circulating on Instagram and TikTok: a woefully incriminating graph evidencing the correlation between when Leo breaks up with his girlfriends and how old they are. ICYMI: not many survive beyond 25.

 

Leo’s Law unleashed a firestorm of activity in the twitterverse, with many weighing in on the problematic nature of this phenomenon. As the Guardian comments, “Twenty-five is a milestone year. It’s when the development and maturation of your prefrontal cortex, the part of the brain responsible for impulse control and decision-making, is finally complete. At 25 you have reached maturity and have a fully formed brain. You also have absolutely no chance of dating Leonardo DiCaprio. As has been frequently observed, the 47-year-old actor appears to be incapable of a relationship with anyone over the age of 25.”

 

DiCaprio's dating history has been immortalized in a chart on Reddit.

Leo’s Law: DiCaprio's dating history TrustLittleBrother / Reddit

 

Rich old men dating young women is, of course, nothing new. Why is the world so hung up on it now?

 

In the post-MeToo era we’ve demanded more accountability from those we revere, and Leo’s Law is alarmingly inconsistent we the progress we expect around gender equity. Don’t take my word for it: research has shown that the age gap between partners decreases in countries with greater gender equality. A paper on the subject notes, “As gender equality increased, women expressed less preference for older men, men expressed less preference for younger women, and consequently the sex difference in the preferred age of mates became smaller.”

 

So what does this have to do with marketing?

 

The way we represent women in marketing is, unsurprisingly and uninterestingly, gender biased. What’s interesting is how much this gender bias compounds with age bias. Google shared findings in an analysis of 2.7 million YouTube ads:

  • Female characters are more likely to be in their 20s and 30s in ads, while male characters are shown across age groups.
  • Globally, male characters are an average of four years older than female characters in ads.
  • Over the five years examined, the average age of female characters stayed relatively consistent while male characters got older.

 

Google explains the problem with the lack of representation of older women in marketing by observing consumer behavior, “Audiences respond to inclusive storytelling. We found that YouTube videos uploaded by advertisers featuring at least as many female characters as male yielded 30% more views than other videos, telling us that when advertisers make their creative more inclusive, people watch. There's an appetite for stories that truly reflect the complexity and diversity of our world. Brands that respect that diversity will earn the trust of their audiences.”

 

Fletcher Knight recently outlined the opportunity in a thought piece that corroborates Google’s findings on consumer preferences:

“Results from a survey taken by Ben Barry, founding director of the Fashion Diversity Lab at Ryerson University, Canada, found that women are 200 percent more likely to buy a product when they see it advertised by someone who reflects their age, and 65 percent less likely when they didn’t. We believe that marketers need to start taking that to heart. ‘Brands are targeted to a different generation, which makes me feel irrelevant,’ a 60-year-old New Yorker told us. ‘No one is really talking to women in their 60s on any level. I want them to talk to me.”

 

It's not rocket science – but as an industry, we still haven’t cracked the code. And time’s running out.

 

We’re speaking to an aging population that will outlive any previous generation, and women are on pace to be the majority in this age group. More than that, they control spending. Forbes published some staggering stats about age 50+ Women:

  • They comprise the largest demographic of incomes over a $100,000;
  • They control 95% of household purchasing decisions and 80% of luxury travel purchases;
  • 82% of them are open to new brands;
  • 75% are willing to pay a little extra for both quality and convenience.

 

Need more proof? Check out the “Empty Nesters” and “Boomer Women” section of this site. One noteworthy stat: Over the next decade, women will control two-thirds of consumer wealth in the United States and be the beneficiaries of the largest transference of wealth in our country’s history. Estimates range from $12 to $40 trillion. Many Boomer women will experience a double inheritance windfall, from both parents and husband. (Source: Fleishman-Hillard New York).

 

Yet, by and large we’re still not talking to older women.

 

Leo’s dating history seems to suggest that for him, women have an expiration date. If marketers continue to follow suit, it could pose the biggest missed opportunity they see in their lifetime.  

 

 

Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Kraft Concerned Over Digital Ad Impressions

Consumer brand, Kraft--one of Ad Age's 100 leading national advertisers--spent more than $35 million dollars on digital advertising in 2013. Recently, the brand has been extremely concerned with advertisement fraud and viewability. Kraft has rejected close to 85% of real-time ad impressions that are offered to them due to quality concern, leaving executives at the brand slightly worried. When Kraft puts in it's "pre-bid" tools, the company rejects anything that appears unsafe, doesn't meet the brand requirements, and is not viewable.

According to the company's director of data, content and media, "75% - 85% is either deemed to be fraudulent, unsafe or non-viewable or unknown." This statistic brings to light conversations about digital advertising "supply-chain" corruption, and raises industry-wide concerns. This analysis from Kraft was only recently highlighted, so time will tell what this really means for the brand and the consumer industry. 

Kraft representatives say that if they do not know where that advertisement is going to end up, they will treat it as unsafe, and end up rejecting the vast majority of impressions out there. Does this drive up their costs? Because there is such a huge pool of inventory, Kraft has been able to achieve it's deliveries without having to pay more.  

SOURCE:

http://adage.com/article/datadriven-marketing/kraft-rejects-75-85-impressions-due-quality-issues/295635/

Monday, June 27, 2011

Consumer Rules... not efficiency... not information...

In this digital era where with the widespread of the internet and the connectivity among databases many platforms emerge in order to provide solutions for current consumer needs... and who is better to forecast or estimate this needs that the King of the information Itself... Google... Google developed and acquired successfully many business to complement its existing business model and to provide better service/ tools for its loyal consumers... Such is the case of broad services such as G Chat, Gmail, Gnews, Gimages, Google finance among many others and the specific ones... google analytics, adplanners, search optimization tools etc... But this time the news hit around for missing the consumer need and developing a Platform that consumers don't really need it or information that consumers don't want to search. Google Health was launched 3 years ago allowing users to track their health related information, prescription, history allowing them to plan ahead saving costs and adding efficiency... Google just announced this week that they are shutting down the service by January 2013 due to consumer lack of adoption to the service... So, even the biggest owner of consumer information still missed in developing a product? Coming from a marketing background it is very important to identify that yes, consumer research and data are key to successful product development, but also its to spend a day in the life of the consumer... With all the insecurity lately around the web who wants to have a file with all your history of diseases and prescriptions? What if those get stolen and everybody can know about them? Just remember how confidential information got spread out in the web with wikileaks... imagine your personal disease/ problems been spread out in the web and anybody can just google you and know your medical history? Is there a real need for this product? Or is it maybe a security concern and maybe the web is not so secure yet? It will be interesting to see now with the big success of Clouds if people upload their medical information to an external database...
The web is till evolving and more information is becoming available for all... but been in a consumers show for a day should save us a lot of research in product development.

Sunday, May 16, 2010

Connecting shampoo giants to their clients

Producers of our favorite every-day brands in shampoos, packaged foods and detergents are increasingly struggling to reach us (their consumers). The audiences are divided between different types of media and advertising can be avoided by using Tivo or watching content on the internet. One outcome of this trend is that in-store advertising, the traditional art of displaying and promoting a product, has gained importance over other forms of media (see e.g. http://adage.com/article?article_id=143643). This channel as well as any direct customer contact is controlled by retailers rather than manufacturers.

A recently founded website seeks to tackle this problem. Alice.com provides consumer goods companies the opportunity to sell directly to consumers via its online market place. Unlike most websites Alice.com does not generate revenues by advertising to clients. It charges manufacturers for in-store-advertising (in the form of coupons) and for providing them with consumer data. The data is a real goldmine: which products are bought together, how often products are bought, when consumers defect from a product, consumer reviews of products etc. This could be the start of an interesting trend connecting shampoo giants with their audience again. (Interview with Alice co-founder can be found here: http://www2.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007607)