Sunday, April 23, 2006

Blogging at Work

This WSJ article will make you glad you did not become a lawyer.

"It's easy to understand why blogging attracts the J.D. set: Few professions combine as much creative talent with so much mind-numbing work."

There is an increasing trend of people blogging at work about their jobs. Some of the early bloggers with many readers have gotten book deals, many are just voicing frustrations with work, and a few have lost their jobs when their employers found out.

TVGuide.com Launches Writers Blog Community

TVGuide recently launched a new blog section on its website - featuring over 65 blogs on various television shows, entertainment news and celebrities. Seems like a great way to retain customers and maintain a brand that has been deeply hurt by the slowly deteriorating print industry.

"We're trying to keep it simple," explained Jay Bryant, director of online communities for TVGuide.com. "This isn't aimed at a tech enthusiast; it's aimed at a much broader population." Bryant noted TVGuide.com plans to build content and traffic in the next two or three months, at which time a "much more robust user community" will be launched in conjunction with the start of the fall television season."

http://www.clickz.com/news/article.php/3600636

Comeback of the Net Boom and Web 2.0

A pretty comprehensive analysis by Fortune.
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/05/01/8375405/index.htm

2 articles on MySpace

This is exactly what we are talking about in class. It's easy for MySpace to attract memebers. it's so powerful that a Texas Community College has to ban its students from using it on campus. http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-MySpace-Ban.html
But it's much harder to make a lot of money, for now. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/23/business/yourmoney/23myspace.html

Friday, April 21, 2006

New media | Talking to yourself | Economist.com

New media | Talking to yourself | Economist.com:
"in the age of mass participation, new media will co-exist with old - indeed it is already increasingly hard to tell when one becomes the other. True, ever more people will upload short video clips to new websites such as YouTube.com, go to Netflix.com to rate their DVDs, to Amazon.com to discuss books and their own blogs for online debate. But that will not replace Steven Spielberg's blockbusters or the New York Times's network of reporters."


The Economist opines about blos and media proliferation.

IAB release 2005 Online Advertising Report

http://www.iab.net/resources/adrevenue/pdf/IAB_PwC_2005.pdf

Chock full of lovely data...

Ted's Take - AIM

Ted's Take - AIM
Ted Leonsis' of AOL's take on the AOL Myspace killer rumor...

Thursday, April 20, 2006

MySpace for the Office

Could social networking help corporate American advance its business goals? Here is one recent attemp.

Venture capital backed "Visible Path" is hoping to use social networking to overcome the sixth degree of separation in the corporate world. So next time instead of making a cold call, you may be able to find someone within your or your friend's social network, who happens to know the CTO or CMO you are trying to reach, and make a proper introduction.

Details, see the Business Week article.

http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2006/tc20060418_044277.htm?chan=technology_technology+index+page_internet

The internet - the place where decisions are made

Nearly 60 million people claimed that the internet has helped them make major decisions in the past two years. Major decisions include college, home refinance, mail order brides. Joking about the last one! This figure has increased by 40% since 2002. The implications of this only reconfirms why all Big Business has been pushing all of its resource into the net over the past decade. We , as people, love instant gratification. The internet is obviously the only place where you can compare across the nation without leaving your own home. As societal synaptic connections and our minds become more similar to that of a 40 year ritalin addict, that which needs constant stimulation, we will continue to turn to the net because it provides the most comprehensive form of information and the most of it. Naturally looking through US News for the best graduate schools just doesn't cut it anymore....we need to read all their is

Did he really say that?

Scrambled Hackz is a new program designed to protect intellectual property rights does so with patented voice recognition software.

The concept is simple: Speak a sentence and choose the proper database of sound bytes. The user’s words are replaced with sounds from the database. For example: see a K-fed interview regarding his marital bliss and then make up your own words. Now he might say what we know he is thinking. “I am taking all her money and I ‘m rich, don't hate the playa hate the game!”

The way that it works is that it takes a an audio video and cuts it into 16th note pieces and gives each a voice recognition pattern and sequences them in a database. Then when a users says something it does the same exact thing and matches their 16th notes patterns to those in the database and reconstructs both the voice pattern and image. I suggest you watch the video clip.

The Internet - a channel to the freedom of speech?

Few months after the big scandal involving big search engines in sharing customers' details in asia, more and more stories appear, creating a feeling of the Internet as a source allowing for more of an open-minded and free expression for people in these countries. The Internet is serving as a shelter and a source of liberalization for some silenced opinions in conservative countries. yet, with the level of stories about governments arresting Internet users in these countries growing, there is also a question of how much should Internet providers allow for these opinions to be heard, knowing that they might serve as a cause for legal acts. As an example, Skype has recently restricted the chat option on its platform in China, preventing users from posting 'wrong' expressions...

article

some more articles
1, 2

Wednesday, April 19, 2006

at the core of the issue

Is the French ruling against restrictive policies of copy-protection technology (fairPlay, ATRAC3, the beginning of the end for non-accesible exclusive file formats?

Probably just the beginning of a long effort for governing bodies to attempt to find a mutually satisfying common ground for both the consumer and the major forces now competing in the digital music industry.

hmt

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060317/ap_on_hi_te/france-ipods

Bambi Francisco: Facebook funding

Bambi Francisco: Facebook funding:

They wanted a $2 billion acquisition price, but settled for $525 mm in post-money valuation? Hmm...

"Facebook received $25 million in funding for a $525 million pre-money valuation.
Nice work for Mark Zuckerberg, who in February 2004 started Facebook in his college dorm. Back then, he paid $85 a month for three months to get his startup going. Zuckerberg -- who turns all of 22 next month - told me once that if his idea failed, there's always Harvard"

Porn Industry Again at the Tech Forefront - Los Angeles Times

Porn Industry Again at the Tech Forefront - Los Angeles Times:

Once again, adult media leads in experimenting with pricing and new channels for distribution...

"Hollywood has resisted burnable discs that can be watched on televisions because they fear piracy. It also doesn't want to alienate retailers, which sell most of its DVDs. But if history is any guide, the online experiment by adult entertainment giant Vivid Entertainment Group will be watched closely by mainstream studio chiefs.

'The simple fact is porn is an early adopter of new media,' said Paul Saffo, director of the Institute for the Future in Palo Alto. 'If you're trying to get something established - you're going to privately and secretly hope and pray that the porn industry likes your medium.'"

WSJ.com - Can Bloggers Make Money?

WSJ.com - Can Bloggers Make Money?

The irony of blogging about bloggers discussing blogging does not escape me....

These two gentlemen discuss the economics of blogging and in a sense they are both right. Jason Calacanis(an acquaintance who unfortunately could not be a speaker this semester) runs (and sold to AOL) an aggregator of top blogs, and Alan Meckler, a longtime entrepreneur. Jason thinks blogs can make money; Meckler thinks 99.9% can't.

I believe they are both right. Generating good content, matching it with advertisers using the automated ad systems of Google et al (essentially outsourcing it), and making a reasonable journalism living is definitely possible - the economics work well enough as Jason points out, for a blog of a certain size.

Getting to that size is the difficulty, and even more so now that entrepreneurs like Jason have blocked out some of the obvious verticals (obvious in that there is an interested audience, ability to create valuable content, and a high values to advertisers) and become embedded in the blogosphere through branding, cross-linking, and indexing by search engines.

However, if one simply thinks of blogs as easy publishing tools for websites that allow the content producer to DIY it, then the only real difference blogs have made to the web is lower the capital cost of website creation and maintenance (barrier to entry) - the same problems of revenue generation and marketing the content developed apply.

Alan Meckler writes: Blogs are really diaries or microcosms of what is happening in millions of ways in daily life -- ranging from special interests to business specialties to whatever. Obviously there is money to be made with blogs, but very, very few will bring in more than a few hundred dollars per year.

Jason created a great business model in aggregating blogs. But here again the opportunities to replicate this model will be few and far between -- the reason being that such a model requires at least one or two anchor blogs that will be attractive to advertisers. Much like great magazine empires that offer magazine networks only a few of the magazines are big winners -- these big winners help support the weaker magazines -- same with blogs

More Facebook!!!

What with all the mention of Facebook.com in our classes as such an admirable site, it might come to the relief of a few that they've raised an additional $25 million in venture capital from Silicon Valley investors, putting to rest rumors of acquisition offers.

http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/14377643.htm

"The company has risen to the seventh most-visited site, by page views, according to comScore Media Metrix, a consumer research service. It had 7.56 million page views in March, a 37 percent increase from February.... Late last month, Business Week reported the company had turned down a buyout offer for $750 million and was looking for as much as $2 billion, citing analysts saying that Viacom, owner of MTV, might make a good match."

More social networking news!!

APRIL 19, 2006

News Analysis

By Steve Rosenbush and Timothy J. Mullaney


Social Networking's Gold Rush

The movement continues to defy doubters and draw big investments. The latest includes $25 million for a piece of Facebook


Just a few months ago, many experts and investors were inclined to dismiss social networking sites as a mere fad. Regardless of how many members sites such as MySpace (NWS ) and Facebook racked up, critics warned that supposedly fickle young Internet users were likely to rush away as soon as the next hot startup came along. And some advertisers were skeptical about the effectiveness of the medium, which features user-created content of a sometimes questionable nature.

Those fears could still turn out to be valid. The sky hasn't fallen yet, though. So with each passing month, investors, big media companies, and advertisers are being forced to seriously consider whether social networking sites can have a viable long-term business model. Whether or not there's a future for social networking, players that are high on the sector's prospects, or simply don't want to miss out on its potential, are pouring in serious money (see BW, 4/10/06, "Socializing for Dollars").

HOT PROPERTIES. These days, new deals are made almost daily. Facebook, a site for college and high-school students, plans to announce Apr. 19 that it has raised $25 million in its latest round of funding from venture-capital firms. That same day, Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. (NWS ), is expected to announce that it is taking a minority stake in SimplyHired, a job-hunting site with a strong social-networking component.(Murdoch jumped into the sector last year with the acquisition of MySpace, the leading social-networking site with a large number of teenage and young adult users.) Meanwhile, on Apr. 17, social-networking site Visible Path said it raised $17 million in venture capital (see BW Online, 04/18/06, "MySpace For the Office").

Social-networking executives say the deals show that investors have increasing confidence in their business plans. "We think we have something really special here, and I think this investment confirms that belief," says Melanie Deitch, director of strategy for Facebook, which is based in Palo Alto, Calif. The company was started just two years ago by three Harvard students, who were sophomores at the time. It now has 7 million registered users, up from 1 million at the beginning of 2005. It ranks as the seventh-busiest site on the Web.

The company plans to use the $25 million in additional funds to add more features to its site. Deitch wouldn't disclose what the Facebook's management team has in mind, although she did note that just last week it launched a new feature that allows members to access the site from mobile phones. The investors include marquee venture-capital investors Greylock, Meritech Capital, Accel, and Peter Thiel. Accel and Thiel have invested in earlier rounds.

Facebook also offered no hint of how investors valued it. Just a few weeks ago, a media executive told BusinessWeek that the owners wanted up to $2 billion in an acquisition; the company didn't disclose how large a stake it had sold for $25 million. And Deitch said the company hadn't hired bankers or looked to sell itself. She did confirm that it had turned down multiple offers from companies that wanted to buy Facebook, though. "Our focus is to build the business for the long term," she said. Facebook already has attracted major advertisers such as Jeep (DCX ) and Microsoft (MSFT ). They can purchase traditional display ads or sponsor affinity groups. Local advertisers such as sororities also can purchase "flyers" to promote local events. "We think Facebook has a unique opportunity to reach a crucial demographic at a key point in their lives. And when a site has this much scale and brand recognition, advertisers will come," said David Sze, a general partner at Greylock.

REFERRAL FEES. The SimplyHired deal shows how social networking is being used as a lever for other kinds of Web sites. News Corp. is going in on a $13.5 million investment with Silicon Valley venture firm Foundation Capital. The deal marks the second round of venture money for SimplyHired, which is competing with established job services like Monster.com (MNST ), CareerBuilder and Yahoo!'s (YHO O) Hotjobs.

However, instead of selling advertising directly to firms looking for workers, SimplyHired searches the Internet for job listings at every place from competing job boards like Monster to the help-wanted section of hiring firms' own Web sites and aggregates them on its site. It gets its revenue from selling paid-search ads, both through Google and other ad networks and through its own sales force. Plus, SimplyHired gets referral fees for finding qualified candidates, including payments from larger job boards that need to deliver value to employers who pay them directly.

"We can deliver job seekers for destinations that have employer relationships, so in that sense it's complementary," CEO Gautam Godhwani says. News Corp put in $3.5 million, while Foundation Capital put in $10 million. Godhwani says there are active talks to make SimplyHired the beginning of a classified strategy for MySpace.

WHO YOU KNOW. Simply Hired's edge among other jobs sites is clever in its use of social networking, says Greg Sterling, founding principal of Sterling Market Intelligence, a consulting and research firm in Oakland Calif. Through a deal with LinkedIn, users can press a button marked "WhoDo I Know?" that is placed with each job listing. LinkedIn searches the user's network to tell them who they know at the hiring company, or who they know who knows someone at the hiring company.

Says Sterling: "That's really the value-added they deliver that sets them apart." Investors hope it's enough value-added to deliver a big return on their optimism.

Tuesday, April 18, 2006

'Perv' This about MySpace

In severe cases convicted child sex offenders have been forced to undergo castration by the state to remove the physical component to a psychological implulse. But who said they should be given another chance! I say 'once gone, say, so long,' in response to a second chance. However social networks may see this slightly differently. Wired News ran the names of convicted sex offenders in the San Francisco area and found 5 that matched in regards to photos, age, height, and locations.

MySpace now faces the challenge of how to exactly go about cleaning up a site that has become home to 70 million users while still maintaining the lure of 'free content.' It appears that absolutely everything goes on MySpace from Spring Break kegstands to butterfly's 'twiterpating.' People can no longer say "Remeber, What happens in Cancun, Stays in Cancun!" Before they do something they may regret.

With a third of the 300 Myspace employees is it realistic they can really keep tabs on the 270,000 new users each day. Come on! The truth is, Myspace really can't do anything about it because it is not illegal. Sex offenders can be forced to stay out of internet chat rooms and out of playgrounds only until there sentence has been served. "Afterward, under typical state laws, the perpetrator's only requirement is to register with law enforcement agencies annually, and upon changing residences, for the rest of his life."

Is this fair or unfair? Do people deserve a second chance? This is after all the land of liberty and freedom? And jail is supposed to be for rehabilitation, it worked for Ol'dirty Bastard right! I am a firm believer in second chances but where do I draw the line. I think that MySpace should be able to ban a user if the crime was serious enough. A governing body at MySpace (dare I say impartial) should determine whether a crime was a one time mishap or a deeply embedded problem that has a chance of recurence.

Like R.Kelly should be ableto get a pass because it really looked like the girl in the Video was at least 19. Joking! But you should check out the 'RKelly trapped in the closet drinking game" on Myspace for a good laugh or great game.

The question remains: Can Myspace play the police without turning it into the next Friendster?
I really think that if they played there cards right and realized that they do not want to go the way of the Dodo it could be accomplished. I do believe that the administrative forces at MySpace do have a moral obligation to keep a site safe that has become the new 'it' place to be young children.

Maybe the way to go about it would be to place real age restrictions on photos. This could easily be targeted by a highly trained college student that comes to work in the same clothes he has worn for last three days because he got lost at the Phish Concert. "Oh look! He isn't 14 he looks 45!" Waala! instant problem alleviation. The next step would be to limit 12 years to people who are within 3 years plus or minus their own age. A special request button for older friends should be assigned that sends the request through a higher level of security. This feature may initself deter convicted sex offenders from approaching youngsters.

For Travelers, a Way to Save More Dollars While Using Fewer Clicks - New York Times

For Travelers, a Way to Save More Dollars While Using Fewer Clicks - New York Times

Per our in-class disucssion of the travel industry and disintermediation, there is news in the meta-search engine space... For players like Kayak and Sidestep, ads and commissions next to the widest offerings of fares are a working business model. Is breadth the new asset for an intermediary?

The battle poses intriguing questions about whether users will expect the big search engines to deliver extremely refined results across all categories, or use those search companies merely to find a good specialty search company.

WSJ Page 1 article on Internet advertising...

**feels like a very old-school, 'gee, whiz companies are online again!' type article but has some positive signs (and data) for online ad spends that seem worth noting...



Once-Wary Industry Giants
Embrace Internet Advertising

Packaged-Goods Companies
Boost Online Spending;
Sites Retool Sales Pitches
Pepsi Employs a Floating Yoda
By KEVIN J. DELANEY
April 17, 2006; Page A1

In their pursuit of advertising dollars, Internet companies are winning some important converts: the consumer packaged-goods companies that sell everything from cookies and cola to skin cream and soap.

After years of cautiously experimenting with Web marketing, powerhouse advertisers like General Mills Inc. and Kraft Foods Inc. are cranking up online spending and increasing the range of brands they promote on the Web. General Mills, maker of Cheerios and Betty Crocker baking mixes, expects to nearly double online-ad spending in the current fiscal year. Kraft, home of Jell-O and Kool-Aid, plans to double its number of online-ad campaigns in 2006 and to increase the number of brands it advertises on the Internet by at least half.

The shift underlines the Internet's threat to traditional media such as television and print magazines. It suggests that the boom in Internet advertising that has already fueled rapid revenue growth in recent years at Google Inc., Yahoo Inc. and other companies could continue as still other groups of more traditional advertisers step up online spending.

The packaged-goods companies say their customers are spending more time online and using the Web in new ways, such as watching TV shows and other video. "Our job is to invest in where consumers are engaging with media," says John Galloway, vice president of sports, media and interactive marketing at PepsiCo Inc.'s Pepsi-Cola North America unit. At his division, online spending is expected to rise to between 5% and 10% of the overall ad budget in 2006, from 1% five years ago.

[Bigger Buy]

Providers of consumer packaged goods accounted for more than 11% of the $145 billion in U.S. ad spending in 2005, according to research firm TNS Media Intelligence. But they spent just 1.6% of their ad dollars online last year, on average, compared with an overall average of 5.8% of total ad spending for U.S. advertisers, says TNS. These advertisers have been the most challenging targets for Internet companies, says Wenda Harris Millard, chief sales officer at Yahoo. That company has overcome some of their resistance by wielding new tools to show that Web ads can increase consumer spending.

U.S. consumers go to the Web for about 15% of the time they spend with all media, according to another research firm, Knowledge Networks Inc. in Menlo Park, Calif. Some Internet executives believe Web spending will echo the patterns set in earlier years with broadcast and cable TV, which both saw sharp growth in advertising once they reached a critical level of consumer adoption.

Others caution against extrapolating too much from recent jumps in online-ad spending by packaged-goods companies. Those companies generally avoid radical changes in the marketing techniques they have fine-tuned over decades, industry executives say. Wary of taking risks with their biggest money makers, managers of brands with big ad budgets have spent less aggressively online than their counterparts at smaller brands, and "it's unclear if and when this will change," says Jon Swallen, senior vice president for research at TNS.

So far, growth in online ad spending has been driven largely by industries like personal computers and financial services. These businesses can link consumers directly to sites where they can buy goods or services online. Spending by such companies helped drive online ad revenue up by about 30% to an estimated $12.5 billion last year from $9.6 billion in 2004, according to the Interactive Advertising Bureau and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

Packaged goods such as beer, toothpaste and paper towels, in contrast, tend not to be sold online. Partly for that reason, even during the Internet frenzy at the end of the 1990s, packaged-goods companies generally didn't spend much to advertise on the Web. The collapse of the online-advertising market in 2001 made marketing on the Internet seem even less compelling.

When online advertising did start to rebound, it was driven largely by search-related ads, not the display-type ads that typified the previous cycle of Internet marketing. Search ads, which appear when consumers enter related keywords into search engines, weren't an obvious fit for packaged-goods companies, because consumers generally don't search the Web for information on items like paper towels.

Another obstacle: It was still hard to prove that online ads led consumers to buy packaged goods offline in stores. The packaged goods companies for years had used complex systems for measuring sales boosts from advertising in traditional media, such as TV and print publications. Without the equivalent for the Internet, online ads were a much tougher sell.

By 2002, Yahoo realized it needed to overhaul its sales approach to packaged-goods companies. The Sunnyvale, Calif., company began developing a way to prove to potential advertisers that online ads contributed to offline sales.

Working with research firm ACNielsen, Yahoo in June 2002 began testing a service called Consumer Direct that allowed advertisers to see the impact of specific Internet ads on sales. ACNielsen, a unit of VNU NV, has approximately 125,000 U.S. families who participate in its Homescan service by recording items they bring home from the store. About 36,000 of them have agreed to let Yahoo monitor what they do on its site as well.

With the ACNielsen data, Yahoo can track when the display of an online ad leads to an offline purchase. It can also give advertisers other useful information, such as whether consumers previously had been heavy users of competing products.

Pepsi North America, one of the first Consumer Direct customers, has used the tracking service five times since 2002. Last year the company used Consumer Direct to monitor and target its "Call Upon Yoda" promotion with a Star Wars theme. In one ad, a green, pointy-eared Yoda character floated across Yahoo's home page to land in a small box near the upper right corner. Users who clicked on the ad box were taken to a Pepsi site, where they were given a chance to win a $100,000 prize.

Using Consumer Direct data, Pepsi was able to place its ads on areas of Yahoo's site most frequented by heavy buyers of 12-packs and 24-packs of soda, its target for the promotion. Pepsi concluded that sales to that group rose in double-digit percentages as a result of the ads, says Pepsi's Mr. Galloway.

Other Internet companies also began offering tracking services. Kraft was another early user of Consumer Direct, and later enrolled its Jell-O brand in a three-month study conducted with Microsoft Corp.'s MSN Internet unit in 2003 and 2004. The study showed about 8% higher purchases by consumers who had seen the online ads compared with those who hadn't.

"The watershed moment was definitely when you could say there was a positive sales increase," says Kathy Olvany-Riordan, Kraft's vice president of global digital and consumer relationship marketing.

Striking Contrast

For Internet executives, the contrast in customer interest is striking. After she arrived at Microsoft in 2001, "I couldn't get an appointment with a Johnson & Johnson, a Procter & Gamble," says Joanne Bradford, corporate vice president of global sales and marketing at Microsoft. Now, she says, "I'm battling to give them as much of my time as they want." Ms. Bradford says ad revenue from packaged-goods companies at MSN is currently more than double the level of a year earlier. She predicts growth will continue to surge.

Packaged-goods companies now spend the majority of their ad dollars on TV. But the rapid spread of home broadband access, to more than 60% of U.S. Internet users today, has made it easier for people to watch video programming online. Use of online video has exploded in the past six months -- from downloads of TV shows such as "The Office" through Apple's iTunes store to user-generated shorts on YouTube's site.

Kraft now devotes just a third of its ad budget to broadcast TV, down from roughly two-thirds five years ago. Kraft executives, like officials at other packaged-goods companies, declined to provide specific totals and breakdowns for ad spending. But they said Internet advertising has been a beneficiary of the shift away from TV.

So far, the increased spending online has had a limited effect on advertising budgets for other media. Spending on TV and radio by packaged-goods companies fell slightly last year from 2004, according to TNS.

Unilever, whose brands include Dove soap and Hellmann's mayonnaise, has cut its global TV budget to about 65% of total ad spending from about 85% in 2001, while shifting the balance to online and to other areas.

One of Europe's biggest packaged-goods companies, Unilever was among the few in its industry to move aggressively into Internet marketing in the late 1990s. But it had trouble detecting an impact on sales, and by 2001 it had slashed the Internet's share of its ad budget.

Unilever began ramping up online spending again after getting positive results for its Suave shampoo, using Yahoo's Consumer Direct service, and participating in other research that suggested online ads for Dove boosted offline sales.

[Media World]

Unilever planned to spend about 4% of its 2005 U.S. ad budget online, a Unilever marketing executive said last year, up from about 1% in 2001. The company now declines to comment on any such breakdown. Noreen Simmons, director of strategic media planning at Unilever's U.S. division, says she expects online-ad spending will grow further in 2006 from 2005.

"We all recognize our consumers are online and we all continue to share the sense that the effectiveness of a traditional 30-second television ad is continuing to erode," says Ms. Simmons. With online ads, "we see our own positive results."

Leading the Charge

Unilever's Axe brand, a range of personal-care products targeted at young men, is leading its online charge. The Axe division spends the majority of its ad dollars on the Internet -- a shift from 2002, when Unilever launched the Axe brand and spent the majority of its ad budget on television. "Ultimately it comes down to where the consumer is," says Kevin George, a Unilever general manager for deodorants.

Besides advertising on sites for young people such as Heavy.com and MySpace, Axe commissioned an online game centered on techniques for picking up women called "Mojo Master." One Axe ad on Heavy.com promoted a cable-TV program produced by Axe about a fictional secret society called The Order of the Serpentine. The large ad showed a young man in a bathrobe with ghost-like women clutching at his legs. It took consumers who clicked on it to a site for the show that heavily promotes Axe's Snake Peel shower scrub.

The explosion of online video is also prompting Anheuser-Busch Inc. to advertise more online. The company spends about 60% of its ad dollars on TV. But Tony Ponturo, its vice president for global media and sports marketing, believes much of consumer video viewing could shift to the Web.

Three years ago, Anheuser-Busch's online ads were essentially limited to the sites of sports it already sponsored, such as Nascar. At the urging of company president August Busch IV last year, marketing executives looked more seriously at the Web. Research they consulted showed that their target 21- to 34-year-old consumers spent about six hours a week online, compared with just 10 minutes a week a decade ago.

Now the maker of Budweiser beer advertises on more than 25 sites, from Yahoo and Time Warner Inc.'s AOL to niche sites including Flavorpill, an arts-and-culture site aimed at urban residents. Anheuser-Busch this summer is sponsoring World Cup soccer content, including video highlights, on Univision Communications Inc.'s site and signed on as a major sponsor for CBS SportsLine's fantasy football season later this year.

Online ads this year will account for about 5% of Anheuser-Busch's ad spending, double the portion in 2005, and Mr. Ponturo says it will rise again next year.

Write to Kevin J. Delaney at kevin.delaney@wsj.com1

URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114523618204327274.html