The Google Webmaster Quality Guidelines are as follows:
1. Avoid hidden text or hidden links
2. Don’t use cloaking or sneaky redirects
3. Don’t send automated queries to Google
4. Don’t load pages with irrelevant keywords
5. Don’t create multiple pages, subdomains, or domains with substantially duplicate content.
6. Don’t create pages with malicious behavior, such as phishing or installing viruses, Trojans, or other badware
7. Avoid “doorway” pages created just for search engines, or other “cookie cutter” approaches such as affiliate programs with little or no original content
8. If your site participates in an affiliate program, make sure that your side adds value. Provide unique and relevant content that gives users a reason to visit your site first.
Link: http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=35769
I believe that any
kinds of professionals must follow ethics defined within their specific fields,
such as engineering, science, or business. However, peoples' judgment on
whether a professional is meeting the ethical guideline could become
subjective if the ethics has not been defined concretely. For example, let's
look into the quality guidelines specified by Google. For the 4th
guideline, what exactly does Google mean "irrelevant keywords?" For the 7th
guideline, how will Google distinguish and identify "other badware?" Moreover,
for the 8th guideline, what is the definition of providing "unique
and relevant content?" In order to help the Gray Hats to progress towards the
White Hats, I believe that Google must elaborate on the quality guidelines.
Furthermore, Google needs to somehow make the guidelines easily available to
all internet users because this will help not only digital marketers but also
all internet users to be aware of the SEO ethics.
No comments:
Post a Comment