The conversations surrounding net neutrality have been
heating up, and have come to a head today when President Obama asks the FCC for
stronger
net neutrality laws. The President’s desire is for internet services to be reclassified
and considered more like a public utility. "I believe the FCC should
create a new set of rules protecting net neutrality and ensuring that neither
the cable company nor the phone company will be able to act as a gatekeeper,
restricting what you can do or see online."
My original reaction to this news was opposed to these
stronger regulations. Not recognizing that the regulations put in place would
actually protect me, the consumer, more. Therefore after my due diligence I am
all for the proposed reclassification. I am against the idea that large
corporations and companies that have a large ad spend or major control could
have the potential to pay for a “faster lane” and allow their content to be
more quickly and easily digested by the consumer. Last week I wrote on Native
Ads, and this takes that idea to another level. At the end of the day, there has to be a line
drawn between money and paying for content and the content ingested and shown
to consumers and viewers. While it would prove highly profitable for internet
providers if they could make deals trading special access for content, I
believe it goes against the rights of all businesses and the individual, and
would turn into the internet being run by corporations even more so, and less
filled with free speech and consumer choice.
No comments:
Post a Comment